From offense to defense in fighting with terror

28.09.2013 Vatan
Translated by: Daily News / www.hurriyetdailynews.com/erdogan-and-barzanis-main-theme-rojava.aspx?pageID=238&nID=57934&NewsCatID=396
Orjinal Metin (tr-9/26/2013)

President Abdullah Gül, at the end of his speech at the United Nations General Assembly the other day, said, “Another important issue that affects us all is terrorism. It is real, extremely dangerous, a crime against humanity, and must be defeated. We can only defeat it once we get rid of ‘my terrorist/your terrorist’ distinctions. Effective international partnership against terrorism remains a key priority for Turkey.” 
These are words Turkey has been repeating at every international platform for years; in other words, they are not new. However, there is a new situation: Turkey used to meanPKK (the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party) when it mentioned terrorism. When it called on the international community for cooperation against terror, it meant, in an implied way, that it was accusing certain countries of supporting the PKK, or at least turning a blind eye to its activities. With the last resolution process and with the PKKstopping its attacks, there was no need for Turkey, or no functional reason, to repeat its calls. As a matter of fact, Turkey started being accused of supporting certain radical Islamist groups in Syria. 
In the Washington Post interview by Lally Weymouth published two days ago, she first asked Gül, “People here [in the United States] are saying that the opposition is dominated by extremists. They’re blaming Qatar, they’re even blaming Turkey for allowing arms to go through Turkey to get to extremist groups like Jabhat al-Nusra. Is that fair?” 
Despite Gül’s answer, “People who say this are wrong and they lack foresight and they don’t know us. I would not accept such an accusation and I would actually see it as a pretext – an excuse – to move away from the events and to not do something;” Weymouth insisted, “One argument that was made throughout the congressional hearings was that the Saudis and Qataris are aiding the radical groups in Syria and that Turkey was allowing aid and radicals to pass through its borders.”
Gül’s answer to this has been this: “These extremists don’t come to Turkey. But the moderates – the ones who are working for democracy – meet in Turkey. We have exposed ourselves so much in helping the moderates. So if this is not appreciated for what it is and, on the contrary, we are blamed for doing something exactly opposite to what we’re doing, I see this as a pretext for people who are trying to move away from the Syrian situation.”
Other American journalists asked similar questions to President Gül; and also questions on the Gezi incidents. There is nothing surprising about this. We, the journalists accompanying President Abdullah Gül in this trip have also asked him these questions. 
The main reason that these questions of “Whether or not Turkey has any relationship with radical groups in Syria” and “if it does, to what extent is this relationship” are brought up so frequently must be Ankara’s failure in “perception management.” 
For example, before Gül explained it to us, we had not witnessed any such clear and open rejections to the accusations as his. Probably, this situation will probably change from now on. 
However, it looks as if the situation of Turkey transforming from an offensive position in international platforms on fighting with terror to a defensive position will continue for a while. 

Destek olmak ister misiniz?
Doğru haber, özgün ve özgür yorum ihtiyacı
Bugün dünyada gazeteciler birer aktivist olmaya zorlanıyor. Bu durum, kutuplaşmanın alabildiğine keskin olduğu Türkiye'de daha fazla karşımıza çıkıyor. Halbuki gazeteci, elinden geldiğince, doğru haber ile özgün ve özgür yorumla toplumun tüm kesimlerine ulaşmaya çalışmalı ve bu yolla, kutuplaşmayı artırma değil azaltmayı kendine hedef edinmeli. Devamı için

Recent articles (10)

21.03.2022	Ruşen Çakır: Laicism out, secularism in
15.03.2021	Turkey’s search for an antithetical foreign policy
03.03.2021	What good can shutting down the People’s Democratic Party do and to whom?
02.02.2021	An example of civil disobedience: Don’t look down people of Boğaziçi University
29.12.2020	Turkey-China relations overshadowed by the Uighur issue
23.12.2020	Erdoğan’s Kurdish issue
24.07.2020	Erdoğan’s greatest strategic mistake
24.06.2020	Turkey-Egypt: The unending fight
27.05.2020	Turkey: Will Erdoğan hold on to his voter base at all costs? Can he retain it?
30.04.2020	Turkey: The search for meaning by children of religious families

10.11.2024		Abdullah Öcalan’a sormak istediğim 20 soru
22.09.2024		Ruşen Çakır nivîsî: Di benda hevdîtina Erdogan û Esed de
17.06.2023		Au pays du RAKI : Entretien avec François GEORGEON
21.03.2022		Ruşen Çakır: Laicism out, secularism in
19.08.2019		Erneute Amtsenthebung: Erdogans große Verzweiflung
05.05.2015		CHP-şi Goşaonuş Sthrateji: Xetselaşi Coxo Phri-Elişina Mualefeti
03.04.2015		Djihadisti I polzuyutsya globalizatsiey I stanovitsya yeyo jertvami. Polnıy test intervyu s jilem kepelem
10.03.2015		Aya Ankara Az Kobani Darse Ebrat Khahad Gereft?
08.03.2015		La esperada operación de Mosul: ¿Combatirá Ankara contra el Estado Islámico (de Irak y el Levante)?
18.07.2014		Ankarayi Miçin arevelki haşvehararı